Thinking clearly

Separate Facts from Assumptions Before You Reply

This article was drafted with AI assistance. Examples are fictional. About our editorial approach.

A colleague writes, ‘We need to discuss the proposal.’ You may read concern, criticism or urgency into that sentence. The fact is that they want a discussion. The reason and timing are still unknown.

Before replying, divide your interpretation into three parts: what the message states, what you are inferring and what you need to know to act. You do not need a formal worksheet. A brief mental pause can reveal where you are filling in gaps.

A useful response is: ‘Sure. Which part would you like to discuss, and is there a time you need a decision?’ It addresses the request without first defending a proposal that may not have been criticized.

This distinction is especially useful when drafting for someone else. A sentence that sounds natural can still contain an unsupported assumption. ‘I’ll finish it tonight’ introduces a commitment even when the source only says the work is underway.

Try checking your next important reply for three things: an emotion you have assigned to the other person, a fact you have not verified and a promise you have not decided to make. Remove or clarify any of them before sending. Accurate communication starts with knowing which parts of the story you actually know.

Explore all published articles →

Interactive concept

One situation. Different relationships.

Explore fictional examples. This is a local, rule-based demonstration of the idea, not a connected AI messaging service.

Incoming message

Known context

Try your own sample message

Nothing entered here is sent, saved or used for training. No message is delivered to another person.

Ask about early access →